Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ralph Michael LEPISCOPO, Defendant-Appellant.

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I [dated March 11, 1969].

The Judgment of the District Court is reversed. The case is remanded for a new trial in light of Blake v. United States, (5 Cir., 1969) 407 F.2d 908 (en banc).

Reversed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. LEPISCOPO
(Apr 16, 1969)