Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

JEAN MITTMAN, Respondent-Appellant, v. MEYER S. MITTMAN, Appellant-Respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: A close reading of the record establishes that the judgment, as modified by the Appellate Division, was correct and just. Consequently, and because the issues arise in a particularly embittered matrimonial litigation, no useful purpose would be served in directing a new trial with only the same result as a likely outcome. Hence, the trial issues raised by plaintiff-respondent-appellant, which would not or should not affect the result, must be disregarded.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING, BREITEL and JASEN.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MITTMAN v. MITTMAN
(Apr 9, 1969)