Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WALTER D. KINSLEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The Gloucester County Court adjudged defendant guilty of violating N.J.S.A. 23:5-28. That section proscribes the pollution of water by permitting deleterious or poisonous substances to be turned into or allowed to run into any of the waters of this State in quantities sufficient to destroy life or disturb the habits of fish or birds inhabiting the same. The statutory fine of $500 for the first offense was imposed. Defendant appeals.

We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Kramer for the County Court, whose opinion is reported in 103 N.J. Super. 190 ( Cty. Ct. 1968).

SULLIVAN, S.J.A.D. (concurring)

Defendant has not raised the defense of double jeopardy (he was found not guilty of the charge in the municipal court). See Dept. of Conservation Economic Development v. Scipio, 88 N.J. Super. 315 ( App. Div. 1965), certification denied 45 N.J. 598 (1965). On this basis I vote to affirm.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. KINSLEY
(Apr 30, 1969)