Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

CHESTER RUDNICKI vs. THE HEARST CORPORATION others.

In this action of tort each of the three defendants demurred to the declaration, and each demurrer was sustained. The plaintiff demurred to the answers filed by each defendant and these demurrers were overruled. The plaintiff moved for judgment against all the defendants and this motion was denied. From these orders the plaintiff appealed. The order denying the motion for judgment was not appealable. Wishnewsky v. Saugus, 325 Mass. 191, 192. There was no error.

Orders sustaining defendants' demurrers affirmed. Orders overruling plaintiff's demurrers affirmed. Appeal from order denying plaintiff's motion for judgment dismissed. Judgments for defendants.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RUDNICKI v. THE HEARST CORPORATION
(May 1, 1969)