ROBINSON v. JOHNSON

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 67.

Attorney(S)

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, Thomas E. Brannigan, Assistant Attorney General, John J. Stamos,
Daniel P. Coman for

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 67.

Attorney(S)

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, Thomas E. Brannigan, Assistant Attorney General, John J. Stamos,
Daniel P. Coman for

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

ROBINSON ET AL. v. JOHNSON ET AL.

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion of THE CHIEF JUSTICE in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 644.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissents for the reasons given in his dissenting opinion in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 655.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.