AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ARTHUR A. PELOSO AND MARILYN PELOSO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CONNECTICUT CORPORATION, AND SOPHIE STEIN SCHILLER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from the entry of summary judgment dismissing their suit to recover against the defendant for a fire loss.

The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Mehler reported at 102 N.J. Super. 357 ( Law Div. 1968). See also Staehle v. American Employers Ins. Co., 103 N.J. Super. 152 ( App. Div. 1968).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PELOSO v. HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO
(May 14, 1969)