Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WALTER SHER, Appellant.

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: (1) Whether the failure to declare a mistrial deprived appellant of a right to a fair trial under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States; (2) Whether a delay in arraignment and a trial court ruling excluding a question as to whether a warning was given before the confession, deprived appellant of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States; (3) Whether the trial court's failure to instruct the jury in the absence of request or exception, that defendant's mental condition at the time of the confession should be considered as bearing on voluntariness, deprived appellant of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States; (4) Whether section 1045 (subd. 2) of the Penal Law violated appellant's privilege against self incrimination under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held there was no violation of any of defendant's constitutional rights.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SHER
(May 28, 1969)