Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Ellis KNIGHTEN v. Ernestine KNIGHTEN.

ELLIS, Judge.

This case is before us on a motion to dismiss the appeals filed herein by the defendant, Ernestine Daniel Knighten, and the intervenor, Curtis Knighten. The motion is based on the failure of the parties to pay fees and costs as required by law.

The affidavits filed herein show that as of March 10, 1969, one month after the extended return day for both appeals, Ernestine Daniel Knighten had not paid the court costs, and Curtis Knighten had paid neither the court costs nor the $25.00 filing fee.

Under the provisions of Article 2127 of the Code of Civil Procedure and R.S. 13:4445, it is the responsibility of the appellant to pay the filing fee and the other costs in the court below not later than three days prior to the return day or extended return day. If the record is not lodged with the appellate court because of non payment of these items, the fault for same is attributable to the appellant.

No special circumstances operating to excuse the non payment of fees and costs appear in this case. The cases of Mathies v. Fruehauf Trailer Co., 170 So.2d 785 (La. App. 1 Cir. 1965), and American Tile and Terrazzo Co. v. Keiler, 194 So.2d 743 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1987) are distinguishable on their facts.

The appeals are, accordingly, dismissed, at appellants' cost.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KNIGHTEN v. KNIGHTEN
(May 26, 1969)