Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. NICHOLAS FINO, Respondent. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant,

Orders affirmed. The question of defendants' standing to challenge the validity of telephone interception orders which supported the search warrant — the sole ground for reversal suggested in this court by the People — was not raised at Trial Term or at the Appellate Division. No special circumstance is shown why the question should be permitted to be raised now for the first time. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL and JASEN.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. FINO
(May 28, 1969)