Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Francis E.P. McCarter, Mr. William Simon of the District of Columbia Bar,
  • Mr. William P. Riess argued the cause for appellants (
  • Ryan, Foster
  • Garofalo,
  • Moore
  • Howell, Mr. Verling C. Enteman,
  • McLaughlin, Dawes
  • Abbotts,
  • Pitney, Hardin
  • Kipp,
  • McCarter
  • English, attorneys). Mr. Donald M. Weitzman argued the cause for respondent (
  • Glucksman
  • Weitzman, attorneys).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Francis E.P. McCarter, Mr. William Simon of the District of Columbia Bar,
  • Mr. William P. Riess argued the cause for appellants (
  • Ryan, Foster
  • Garofalo,
  • Moore
  • Howell, Mr. Verling C. Enteman,
  • McLaughlin, Dawes
  • Abbotts,
  • Pitney, Hardin
  • Kipp,
  • McCarter
  • English, attorneys). Mr. Donald M. Weitzman argued the cause for respondent (
  • Glucksman
  • Weitzman, attorneys).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

NICHOLAS DEL SPINA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. GETTY OIL COMPANY, ET AL.,DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinions of Judge Mintz in the Chancery Division, 99 N.J. Super. 574, 102 N.J. Super. 459 .

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

DEL SPINA v. GETTY OIL CO
(Jun 6, 1969)