Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number No. 17647. Attorney(S) Stephen Luther Evans, pro se. Louis C. Bechtle, U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., (Drew J.T. O'Keefe, U.S. Atty., Jerome R. Richter, Asst. U.S. Atty. on the brief), for appellee. Judges Abraham Lincoln Freedman Collins Jacques Seitz Ruggero John Aldisert Acts Judiciary And Judicial Procedure — Habeas Corpus — Particular Proceedings — Federal Custody; Remedies On Motion Attacking Sentence See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. Stephen Luther EVANS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America. OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from a denial of a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate a sentence based on a bank robbery conviction by a jury. Appellant's conviction was affirmed on appeal. See United States v. Evans, 239 F. Supp. 554 (E.D. Pa. 1965), aff'd., 359 F.2d 776 (3rd Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 863, 87 S.Ct. 120, 17 L.Ed.2d 90 (1966). In his section 2255 petition appellant asserts certain new grounds and variations of errors alleged previously in his direct review proceedings. In the latter category is the claim that he alone was compelled to wear sunglasses during a police line-up as did the alleged robber during the hold-up. The short answer is that the record shows that the other participants in the line-up also wore sunglasses. Appellant makes a series of arguments as a last resort that he was represented by ineffective court-appointed counsel. Assuming such arguments are now cognizable, we find them either to be unsupported by the record or lacking in legal merit. The same can be said of his other allegations of error in the conduct of the trial. The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.