CITY OF NEWARK v. NORTH JERSEY DISTRICT WATER SUP. COMM, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Sam Weiss argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. Philip E. Gordon, attorney). Mr. Oscar R. Wilensky argued the cause for respondents ( Mr. Harvey Blicksilver, on the brief).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Sam Weiss argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. Philip E. Gordon, attorney). Mr. Oscar R. Wilensky argued the cause for respondents ( Mr. Harvey Blicksilver, on the brief).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NORTH JERSEY DISTRICT WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION, ET AL.,DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Mintz in the Chancery Division, 106 N.J. Super. 88.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.