Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Stewart M. Hutt argued the cause for appellants (
  • Hutt
  • Berkow, attorneys). Mr. Marc J. Gordan
  • Mr. Mark L. Stanton argued the cause for
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Stewart M. Hutt argued the cause for appellants (
  • Hutt
  • Berkow, attorneys). Mr. Marc J. Gordan
  • Mr. Mark L. Stanton argued the cause for
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

CARDELL, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND J. RICHARDHUDANICH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF MADISON, A MUNICIPALCORPORATION IN THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND MANZOCONTRACTING CO., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY,DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Labrecque in the Appellate Division.

For reversal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For affirmance — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

CARDELL, INC. v. TOWNSHIP OF MADISON
(Jun 6, 1969)