Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Charles E. PRATER v. STATE.

CATES, Judge.

Prater was indicted and convicted of falsely pretending to Paul Brown with intent to defraud that he owned an inventor's patent, etc. The trial judge fixed his punishment at three years imprisonment.

The State over objection which was overruled, introduced an uncertified copy of letters patent. The heading noted Prater as "assignor to P. A. B. B. Incorporated, Meridian, Miss."

In its uncertified form this document was hearsay. Code 1940, T. 7, § 432 provides in pertinent part:

"As an additional or alternative mode of proof, the following documents may be proven as follows: * * *
"9. Documents in the departments of the United States government, by the certificate of the legal custodian thereof."

The admission of this document was prejudicial and requires a reversal of the judgment of conviction. We forego consideration of how the State can prove as of the period November 11-December 2, 1964 (the span of time covered by Brown's payments to Prater) that the letters patent (if certified) were still under assignment to a person other than Prater.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed and the cause is there remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PRATER v. STATE
(Jun 17, 1969)