Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LEMKE v. KITA

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff commenced this action against Adolf Kita and others, jointly and severally. Mr. Kita was consul general of the Polish People's Republic at Chicago, Illinois for various States, including Michigan.

Mr. Kita moved to quash the service of summons and for dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the courts of this State are without jurisdiction to entertain a suit against a consul of a foreign state. The trial judge granted judgment dismissing the complaint as to Mr. Kita.

We affirm. The relevant statute is entirely clear:

"The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of all actions and proceedings against consuls or vice consuls of foreign states." 28 USCA, § 1351. (Emphasis supplied.)

Manifestly, an action against the consul of a foreign state, such as Mr. Kita, may not be commenced in the circuit court.

Defendant did not waive the lack of jurisdiction of the circuit court when he asserted such lack of jurisdiction by motion to quash and dismiss. Nor is there merit in plaintiff's claim that Mr. Kita waived his right to assert this lack of jurisdiction by failing to remove the case to the Federal courts. Mr. Kita had no obligation so to remove the case, even if removable. His motion to quash and dismiss was timely.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LEMKE v. KITA
(Jun 23, 1969)