Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROLAND KILCREASE, AND WILMA KILCREASE, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS, v. ROLAND KILCREASE, FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND RAYMOND HARPER, AND DIANE HARPER, APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment appealed is affirmed on authority of Shingleton et al. v. Bussey, 223 So.2d 713, decided by the Supreme Court of Florida May 28, 1969.

RAWLS, Acting C.J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KILCREASE v. KILCREASE
(Jun 19, 1969)