AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

George J. BRIGNAC, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant, v. PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, Leonard S. Withrow, Thelma Stegall Withrow and Trinity Uni

MILLER, Judge.

For the reasons stated in the consolidated case of Brignac v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation, 224 So.2d 84, in which a separate decision is being rendered by us this date, the judgment appealed in the present case is affirmed.

Affirmed.

HOOD, Judge (dissenting).

For the reasons which I assigned in my dissenting opinion in Brignac v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation et al., 224 So.2d 84, I respectfully dissent from the opinion rendered by the majority in the instant suit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRIGNAC v. PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION
(Jun 24, 1969)