Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JAMES HOWARD WHITTED, Appellant.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

GOODWIN, J.

The defendant appeals a conviction under ORS 167.210. He asked an eleven-year-old girl to engage in sexual relations with him. She refused, and the police were notified. A jury found him guilty of an act "which manifestly tended to cause" the child to become a delinquent child.

For the reasons set forth in State v. Hodges, decided this day, 254 Or. 21, 457 P.2d 491, the portion of the statute under which the defendant was indicted is unconstitutional and the conviction cannot stand. The cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to discharge the defendant in this proceeding and for reference to the grand jury in the event that the prosecution deems it proper to proceed under another statute.

Reversed and remanded.

HOLMAN, J., specially concurring.

I concur for the reasons set forth in my concurring opinion in the case of State v. Hodges, 254 Or. 21, 457 P.2d 491, decided this day. The actions complained of obviously were not such as clearly could tend to cause the child in question to become delinquent.

SLOAN and DENECKE, JJ., join in this specially concurring opinion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. WHITTED
(Jul 24, 1969)