Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PEOPLE v. CRAIG

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Edgar Milton Craig was convicted of murder in the first degree by a jury in Recorder's Court of Detroit on July 26, 1968. CL 1948, § 750.316 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.548). On appeal he raises three issues, two objecting to instructions and the third claiming error because the court accepted a people's request to charge after final argument. The people have filed a motion to affirm the conviction.

GCR 1963, 817.5

No objections to the instructions were made at trial, as required by GCR 1963, 516.2, and therefore this asserted error may not be raised in this Court for the first time unless it appears that justice so requires. People v. Keiswetter (1967), 7 Mich. App. 334, 342. An examination of the brief, the motion to affirm and the record convinces us that justice does not require further consideration of the instructions in question. The third issue is without merit for the reason that a request to charge is timely if presented to the court before the case is submitted to the jury. Morrison v. W.R. Reynolds Co. (1923), 224 Mich. 61, 65. The questions presented here on appeal are unsubstantial and require no formal argument or submission.

The motion to affirm defendant's conviction is granted.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CRAIG
(Jul 28, 1969)