Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CANTRELL et al. v. ABERNATHY.

QUILLIAN, Judge.

1. Where no transcript of evidence is filed all grounds requiring a consideration of evidence must be affirmed. Cofield v. Johnson, 118 Ga. App. 689 ( 165 S.E.2d 472).

2. The appellants contend that they were deprived of their constitutional right to due process because they were not properly notified of the proceeding and were not given a right to obtain an attorney. There is nothing to show these issues were raised in the lower court.

Constitutional questions cannot be considered by the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court where it does not appear from the record that they were raised in the trial court. Smith v. Dallas Utility Co., 27 Ga. App. 22 ( 107 S.E. 381); Herrington v. City of Atlanta, 224 Ga. 465 (5) ( 162 S.E.2d 420). There is no merit in the enumeration of errors.

Judgment affirmed. Pannell and Evans, JJ., concur.

ARGUED JULY 7, 1969 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 19, 1969.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CANTRELL v. ABERNATHY
(Sep 19, 1969)