Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of JOHN J. SANTUCCI, Respondent, v. JAMES M. POWER et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, and SIDNEY LEVISS, Appellant.

Order affirmed, without costs, on the authority of Matter of Ippolito v. Power ( 22 N.Y.2d 594) and Matter of O'Connor v. Power ( 23 N.Y.2d 909).

Concur: Chief Judge FULD, and Judges BURKE, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON. Judges SCILEPPI and BERGAN dissent and vote to reverse on the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.

Motion by candidate Zelman to intervene denied. Counsel for movant in open court stated that he was withdrawing his application made at Special Term and that he consented to vacatur of a stay of the special election contained in an order to show cause which he had obtained.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF SANTUCCI v. POWER
(Sep 24, 1969)