Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DAVIS et al. v. PONTIAC MOTOR DIVISION OF GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION et al.

JORDAN, Presiding Judge.

This is a suit by the purchaser of a Pontiac automobile against the dealer and the manufacturer, relying upon the representations made to him at the time of the purchase. The trial court, after considering the pleadings, affidavits and depositions, granted the motion for summary judgment as to both defendants and the plaintiff appeals. Held:

We affirm. A careful examination of the record reveals that the defendant manufacturer fulfilled all its obligations called for under its New Vehicle Warranty, having made all repairs and replacements necessary during the term of the 24-month or 24,000-mile warranty. The record further discloses that no further representations were made to the purchaser, either by the dealer or the manufacturer, other than the New Vehicle Warranty, which disclaimed all other warranties express or implied. See Brown v. Chrysler Corp., 112 Ga. App. 22 ( 143 S.E.2d 575).

Judgment affirmed. Hall and Whitman, JJ., concur.

ARGUED APRIL 8, 1969 — DECIDED OCTOBER 3, 1969.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DAVIS v. PONTIAC MOTOR DIV. OF GEN. MOTORS CORP
(Oct 3, 1969)