Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Commonwealth ex rel. Rakus, Appellant, v. Maroney.

Criminal Law — Plea of guilty — Evidentiary hearing to determine whether plea was knowingly and voluntarily made.

Mr. Chief Justice BELL filed a dissenting opinion.

OPINION PER CURIAM, October 9, 1969:

The order of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County is vacated, and the record is remanded to that court for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether appellant's guilty plea was knowingly and voluntarily made. See Commonwealth v. Patterson, 432 Pa. 76, 247 A.2d 218 (1968).

DISSENTING OPINION BY MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BELL:

The record shows that no evidentiary hearing was necessary. This sentence of murder was imposed in 1949 and the record shows that defendant's two experienced counsel stated that they had investigated the case thoroughly, interviewed every witness they could, and felt that defendant's change of plea from not guilty to guilty was in his best interest. To grant an evidentiary hearing in 1969 — on defendant's allegation that his plea was involuntary and not knowingly made, even when his present Court-appointed counsel could not write a brief to support this allegation — is unnecessary, extremely unwise and extremely unfair to the law-abiding people of Pennsylvania. For these reasons, I dissent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COM. EX REL. RAKUS v. MARONEY
(Oct 9, 1969)