Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Clive S. Cummis argued the cause for appellants, cross-respondents ( Messrs. Cummis, Kent Radin, attorneys; Mr. David S. Litwin on the brief). Mr. Theodore L. Abeles argued the cause for defendants, cross-appellants ( Messrs. Lum, Biunno Tompkins, attorneys; Mr. William F. Tompkins, of counsel).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Clive S. Cummis argued the cause for appellants, cross-respondents ( Messrs. Cummis, Kent Radin, attorneys; Mr. David S. Litwin on the brief). Mr. Theodore L. Abeles argued the cause for defendants, cross-appellants ( Messrs. Lum, Biunno Tompkins, attorneys; Mr. William F. Tompkins, of counsel).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

LAWRENCE SMITH, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ANDLIVINGSTON PROPERTIES CORP., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ETAL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Mintz in the Chancery Division, 106 N.J. Super. 444. The stay heretofore granted by the order of September 30, 1969, is vacated.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — NONE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

SMITH, ET AL. v. TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON, ET AL
(Oct 15, 1969)