AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PETER PONTANI, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered September 9, 1968, convicting him of abortion and unlawful practice of medicine, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. In our opinion the trial court committed no error in allowing into evidence the statement inculpating appellant, made by the codefendant who was acquitted, and in charging the jury that, if they found a conspiracy to exist between appellant and said codefendant, the statement might be considered in connection with the innocence or guilt of appellant. Even though no count of conspiracy was contained in the indictment, it was proper for the court to admit the statement and to charge as indicated ( People v. Luciano, 277 N.Y. 348; People v. Bonsignore, 21 A.D.2d 309; United States v. Annunziato, 293 F.2d 373), especially in view of the overwhelming proof of appellant's guilt (24B C.J.S., Criminal Law, § 1922 [3], pp. 163-167). Other points raised by appellant have been considered. Beldock, P.J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. PONTANI
(Nov 3, 1969)