Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PEOPLE v. HUGHES

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted by the court of committing indecent liberties with a child (MCLA § 750.336, Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.568). The sole issue raised by defendant on appeal is whether the prosecution proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

Examination of the record discloses that there was sufficient proof presented by the people to establish the guilt of the defendant. While defendant's testimony contradicted that of the complainant, the trial court as the trier of fact had an opportunity to examine the demeanor of the witnesses as they testified and could properly consider their interest or lack of interest in the outcome of the case in evaluating their testimony. The underlying issue is credibility, which is an issue confided for resolution to the trier of fact and not to us. See People v. Szymanski (1948), 321 Mich. 248, 253; People v. Doris White (1965), 2 Mich. App. 104, 106; People v. Ritzema (1966), 3 Mich. App. 637; and People v. Wheeler (1967), 7 Mich. App. 576.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. HUGHES
(Nov 26, 1969)