MAHLER v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for the appellant (
Major Major, attorneys). Mr. Robert L. Garibaldi argued the cause for the respondents ( Mr. Floyd V. Amoresano, attorney).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for the appellant (
Major Major, attorneys). Mr. Robert L. Garibaldi argued the cause for the respondents ( Mr. Floyd V. Amoresano, attorney).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

ARTHUR F. MAHLER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THEBOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN AND THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — NONE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.