Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matters of Walter R. BRAUND and Virginia M. Braund, Bankrupts. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. William A. McGUGIN, Appellee.

PER CURIAM:

The only substantial question presented is whether the proviso in section 17a (1) of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C. § 35(a), preserves a pre-bankruptcy tax lien as to assets acquired after bankruptcy. The three district courts which have considered this question have answered it in the negative. In re Carlson, 292 F. Supp. 778 (C.D.Calif. 1968); In re Braund, 289 F. Supp. 604 (C.D.Calif. 1968); United States v. Sanabria (N.D. Ill., June 21, 1968) (Unreported) (Appeal pending in the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 17,145). See also Marsh, Triumph or Tragedy? The Bankruptcy Amendments of 1966, 42 Wn.L.Rev. 681 (1967); Note, 14 Vill. L.Rev. 323, 326 (1969).

There are substantial arguments on both sides, but we have concluded that on balance the result reached in these decisions is the better one.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF BRAUND
(Feb 9, 1970)