Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of ESTELLE D. HANDEL, Respondent, v. BERNARD HANDEL, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the affirmative in the following memorandum:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative on the ground that respondent-appellant failed to move for a protective order under CPLR 3122 or to show cause why his failure to so move was excusable ( Zeif v. Zeif, 31 A.D.2d 625; Coffey v. Orbachs, Inc., 22 A.D.2d 317, 319-320), and neither the Appellate Division nor the Family Court exercised discretion to excuse compliance with CPLR 3122, a discretion which either court undoubtedly had. No other issue is passed upon.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF HANDEL v. HANDEL
(Mar 4, 1970)