Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Orin Lee MOLO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

OPINION

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The offense is robbery; the punishment, enhanced under Art. 62, Vernon's Ann.P.C. by a prior conviction for felony theft, life.

Trial was before a jury on a plea of not guilty.

The sole defense was insanity. A plea of present insanity, or competency to stand trial, had been resolved against appellant in a preliminary trial in another robbery case against appellant.

The record on appeal was approved on May 28, 1969, and due notice given.

No brief was filed in the trial court as required by Art. 40.09, Sec. 9, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P.

There is no showing of indigency.

The right of appellant to trial on the issue of insanity while the appeal is pending is not foreclosed. Art. 46.02(4) V.A.C.C.P.

The judgment is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MOLO v. STATE
(Mar 4, 1970)