AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

PAUL HEFFERNAN, Plaintiff, v. HERTZ CORP. et al, Respondents. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Inter

In a negligence action by a member of the United States Army to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 10, 1969, which denied a motion by the United States of America for leave to intervene in the action as a party plaintiff. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Appellant's complaint shall be served within 20 days after entry of the order hereon and respondents' answer thereto shall be served within 20 days after service of said complaint. In our opinion, the Federal Medical Care Recovery Act (U.S. Code, tit. 42, § 2651 et seq.) gives the United States the absolute right to intervene in a State or Federal court to recover the reasonable value of the care and treatment furnished or to be furnished by the United States when an injured member of the United States Army brings an action against his tort-feasors ( Carrington v. Vanlinder, 58 Misc.2d 80; Tolliver v. Shumate, 151 W. Va. 105; cf. United States v. Gera, 409 F.2d 117). Hopkins, Acting P.J., Munder, Martuscello, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HEFFERNAN v. HERTZ CORP
(Mar 13, 1970)