Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

HEMPHILL et al. v. HOME INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

PER CURIAM.

Our judgment in this case having been entered March 6, 1970, and a motion for rehearing having been received in the office of the clerk by ordinary mail March 17, 1970, more than ten days from the entering of the judgment, thus not complying with our rule requiring the filing of the motion within ten days, the motion is disallowed.

Although it appears that the motion was mailed and postmarked March 14, 1970, the mailing was not registered or certified and movant assumed the risk of the delay in delivery. Rentfrow v. Smith, 225 Ga. 493 ( 169 S.E.2d 807); Colleps v. Calhoun Finance Co., 121 Ga. App. 20 ( 172 S.E.2d 454).

Motion disallowed. Bell, C. J., Jordan, P. J., Hall, P. J., Eberhardt, Pannell, Deen, Quillian, Whitman and Evans, JJ., concur.

DECIDED MARCH 20, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

(See page 323, ante.)
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HEMPHILL v. HOME INSURANCE COMPANY
(Mar 20, 1970)