AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Luther M. YOUNG, Jr., Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Young, the plaintiff, brought an action in the United States District Court under § 301 of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 185, alleging that Southwestern Bell, his employer, had breached its collective bargaining contract by discharging him at a time when he had less than three years' service with the company.

Young sought reinstatement, back pay and restoration of all other rights. The labor contract does not limit the company in its right to discharge an employee with less than three years' service. This is not disputed. The case was submitted to the court on cross-motions for summary judgment.

It is settled law that absent a contractual provision, the employer has the right to hire and discharge employees at will provided the motivating cause is not a protected union activity. See, e.g., Kellwood Co., Ottenheimer Bros. Mfg. Div. v. NLRB, 411 F.2d 493 (8th Cir. 1969).

Chief Judge Henley, in a published memorandum opinion, thoroughly recites the facts and sets forth the applicable law. We agree with the conclusion reached and affirm the judgment on the basis of the district court opinion in Young v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., 309 F. Supp. 475 (E.D.Ark. 1969).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

YOUNG v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
(Apr 1, 1970)