Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Da v. d LAWRENCE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

PER CURIAM:

This appeal, filed sixty three days after the denial of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, is dismissed. See Allen v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1967, 384 F.2d 745. There is no showing that the failure to file the notice of appeal within the extended time period of 30 days provided under Rule 4(a), Federal Rules Appellate Procedure, was attributable to anyone other than appellant. We thus deem the case of Fallen v. United States, 1964, 378 U.S. 139, 84 S.Ct. 1689, 12 L.Ed.2d 760, to be inapplicable.

This appeal was dismissed by order of this court dated September 25, 1968. Lawrence v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1968, 401 F.2d 177. That order was vacated on November 20, 1968. The court then ordered that the motion be carried with the case for disposition. Council was appointed to represent appellant. Lawrence v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1968, 404 F.2d 614.

As to appellant's right to file an additional petition for writ on the same or other grounds in the District Court, see Sanders v. United States, 1963, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S.Ct. 1068, 10 L.Ed.2d 148.

Appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM:

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LAWRENCE v. WAINWRIGHT
(Apr 6, 1970)