STATE v. ZOLD, N.J. Super. App. Div., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Daniel R. Coburn, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney). Mr. Robert L. Messick, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. A. Donald Bigley, Camden County Prosecutor, attorney).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Daniel R. Coburn, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney). Mr. Robert L. Messick, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. A. Donald Bigley, Camden County Prosecutor, attorney).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DOUGLAS ZOLD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons given by Judge Peel in his opinion denying post-conviction relief. 105 N.J. Super. 194 (Law Div. 1969).

All other questions raised are concluded against defendant by the opinion (unreported) of this court affirming the conviction on the direct appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.