Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Geraldine Arlene HOTTELL, Appellant, v. Max HOTTELL, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Geraldine Arlene Hottell, complains of a judgment entered on June 27, 1969, after a jury trial, granting appellee a divorce from appellant. The decree awarded appellant custody of the couple's three minor children subject to appellee's right to reasonable visitation and required him to make certain child support payments. Although the parties own community property and appellee prayed for a division of same, no ruling was made by the trial court regarding such property. The decree provides in part: 'And the matter of community property and debts is left pending and without any ruling from this Court to remain 'as is' at this time until the parties reach an agreement, if any is possible.'

Such decree is not a final, appealable judgment, since the trial court expressly reserved for future order a determination of the property issues. Keene v. Keene, 445 S.W.2d 624 (Tex.Civ.App. — Dallas 1969, writ dism'd); Henderson v. Henderson, 425 S.W.2d 363 (Tex.Civ.App. — San Antonio 1968, writ dism'd); Angerstein v. Angerstein, 389 S.W.2d 519 (Tex.Civ.App. — Corpus Christi 1965, no writ). We therefore have no jurisdiction at this time.

The appeal is dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOTTELL v. HOTTELL
(May 13, 1970)