AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

SHEILA MULLIGAN et al., Appellants, v. HENRY C. SPERKA, Respondent.

Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 11, 1969, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements (see Nesbitt v. Nimmich, 34 A.D.2d 958). Christ, P.J., Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Munder and Rabin, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order appealed from and grant plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum in Nesbitt v. Nimmich ( 34 A.D.2d 958). (See, also, Schwartz v. Public Administrator of County of Bronx, 24 N.Y.2d 65.)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MULLIGAN v. SPERKA
(Jun 1, 1970)