Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

AMERICAN B.D. COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, RESPONDENT, v. HOUSE OFSEAGRAMS, INC., t/a BROWNE-VINTNERS COMPANY, APPELLANT.NATIONAL WINE LIQUOR CO., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, RESPONDENT,

PER CURIAM.

The judgments in American B.D. Comany v. House of Seagrams, Inc. and in National Wine Liquor Co. v. House of Seagrams, Inc. are affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Sullivan in the Appellate Division, 107 N.J. Super. 264 (App.Div. 1969), certification granted 55 N.J. 166 (1969). The judgments in Flagstaff Liquor Co. v. Browne-Vintners Company, and in Joeli Wine Distributors, Inc. v. Browne-Vintners Company are affirmed for the reasons expressed in the unreported opinions of the Appellate Division, certification granted in the former 55 N.J. 167 (1969) and in the latter 55 N.J. 311 (1970).

For affirmance — Justices FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 5.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

AMERICAN B.D. CO. v. HOUSE OF SEAGRAMS, INC
(Jun 1, 1970)