CORBIN v. ULRICH

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 69-719.

Attorney(S)

Kaleel, Kaleel Kaleel, St. Petersburg, for
L.C. Schowe of Riley, Davis, Schowe Saltsman, St. Petersburg, for appellee Charles C.
Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison Kelly, by H. Vance Smith, Tampa, for appellee Borden,

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 69-719.

Attorney(S)

Kaleel, Kaleel Kaleel, St. Petersburg, for
L.C. Schowe of Riley, Davis, Schowe Saltsman, St. Petersburg, for appellee Charles C.
Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison Kelly, by H. Vance Smith, Tampa, for appellee Borden,

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

RICHARD E. CORBIN, AND R.E. CORBIN, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANTS, v. CHARLES C. ULRICH, AND BORDEN INCORPORATED, APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Greenberg v. Post, 1944, 155 Fla. 135, 19 So.2d 714; Luster v. Moore, Fla. 1955, 78 So.2d 87, and Thrifty Super Market, Inc. v. Kitchener, Fla.App. 1969, 227 So.2d 500.

LILES, A.C.J., and PIERCE and MANN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.