AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of HERBERT D. ROISTACHER, Respondent, v. THOMAS F. McCOY, as State Administrator of the Administrati

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT: Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding submitted to Special Term, Supreme Court, New York County, for an evidentiary hearing. (See Matter of McPartland v. McCoy, 35 A.D.2d 641.) Reynolds, J.P., Staley, Jr., and Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court. Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm, in a memorandum by Cooke, J.

Cooke, J. (dissenting).

The judgment should be affirmed on the grounds set forth in the dissent in Matter of McPartland v. McCoy, decided herewith. Here, there is proof of an additional objective standard, the training by petitioner of "subordinates in special areas of practice and procedures", as well as considerable other evidentiary material. Exhibits received before the Special Classification Appeals Board, consisting of several letters from Justices who have served in Part XXX, New York County, variously state: "The probability is that almost as many cases are disposed of in Part XXX in the course of the year as in all the other criminal parts combined", "Part 30 of the Supreme Court is probably the busiest part in that Court" and "[Part XXX is] the largest and most active criminal part in the County, if not the State."

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF ROISTACHER v. McCOY
(Jul 20, 1970)