Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CHARLES MONROE FERREN, Appellant.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant pleaded guilty to assault with a dangerous weapon and was sentenced to five years in prison. On this direct appeal his sole assignment of error is that the trial court, in accepting his guilty plea, did not directly advise him of the maximum statutory penalty for his crime. As we said in State v. Brudos, 3 Or. App. 239, 240, 471 P.2d 861, Sup Ct review denied (1970):

"Even if we assumed that there was any merit in defendant's * * * assignment of error we could not consider it on direct appeal. The thrust of ORS 138.050 is that after a plea of guilty the only question which may be considered on direct appeal is the nature of the sentence, that is, whether the punishment is excessive, cruel or unusual. State v. Shannon, 242 Or. 404, 409 P.2d 911 (1966); State v. Middleton, 2 Or. App. 70, 465 P.2d 913 (1970); State v. Kabachenko, 2 Or. App. 202, 465 P.2d 891 (1970). If the defendant thinks that he has any justifiable grounds for having his plea[s] of guilty set aside he must present those grounds within the procedural framework mandated by the legislature."

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. FERREN
(Jul 30, 1970)