Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ESTEY CORPORATION, Appellant, v. ST. MARY'S UNIVERSITY, Appellee.

BARROW, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by Estey Corporation from an order sustaining the plea in abatement of St. Mary's University and dismissing the original petition filed by Estey Corporation, but directing the parties to proceed to trial on the merits of the cross-action filed in said cause by St. Mary's University against Estey Corporation and Continental Insurance Company. St. Mary's University has filed its motion to dismiss this appeal, wherein it urges that the order entered herein is not a final judgment.

It is settled that, with certain exceptions not applicable here, an appeal may be prosecuted only from a final judgment; and that to be final, a judgment must dispose of all issues and parties in a case. North East Independent School Dist. v. Aldridge, 400 S.W.2d 893 (Tex.Sup. 1966); Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Texas Pacific Coal Oil Company, 159 Tex. 550, 324 S.W.2d 200 (1959).

Here the judgment is intrinsically interlocutory in character in that the cross-action is specifically recognized and left untried and unadjudicated. Furthermore, there was no order for a severance of such Estey Corporation's original petition is cause of action. The order of dismissal of interlocutory and no appeal may be prosecuted therefrom at this time. Hall v. City of Austin, 450 S.W.2d 836 (Tex.Sup. 1970).

The appeal of Estey Corporation is dismissed.

CADENA, J., not participating.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ESTEY v. ST MARY'S UNIV
(Sep 2, 1970)