NEW ENGLAND FISH CO. v. BARGE OR VESSEL SONYA

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 24787.

Attorney(S)

Robert V. Zener (argued), Alan S. Rosenthal, Stephen R. Felson, Attys., Wm. D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., John F. Meadows, Atty., Admiralty Shipping Section, U.S. Dept. of Justice, San Francisco, Cal., Douglas B. Baily, U.S. Atty., Anchorage, Alaska, for appellant. W.C. Arnold (argued), Anchorage, Alaska, for appellees. Joseph H. Shortell, Anchorage, Alaska, for defendant Marine View Fisheries, Inc. Burr, Pease Kurtz, Anchorage, Alaska, for intervenor Nakat Packing Corp. Roy H. Madsen, Kodiak, Alaska, for intervenor Kodiak Oil Sales, Inc.

Judges

Richard Harvey Chambers
Frederick George Hamley
John Francis Kilkenny

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 24787.

Attorney(S)

Robert V. Zener (argued), Alan S. Rosenthal, Stephen R. Felson, Attys., Wm. D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., John F. Meadows, Atty., Admiralty Shipping Section, U.S. Dept. of Justice, San Francisco, Cal., Douglas B. Baily, U.S. Atty., Anchorage, Alaska, for appellant. W.C. Arnold (argued), Anchorage, Alaska, for appellees. Joseph H. Shortell, Anchorage, Alaska, for defendant Marine View Fisheries, Inc. Burr, Pease Kurtz, Anchorage, Alaska, for intervenor Nakat Packing Corp. Roy H. Madsen, Kodiak, Alaska, for intervenor Kodiak Oil Sales, Inc.

Judges

Richard Harvey Chambers
Frederick George Hamley
John Francis Kilkenny

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

NEW ENGLAND FISH COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. The BARGE OR VESSEL SONYA, etc., et al., Appellant.

PER CURIAM:

The award of the district court of attorney fees from the proceeds of sale of the Vessel Sonya is affirmed. We find it was not clearly erroneous.

The likelihood of another factual situation occurring just like the one here is so remote that it is not thought a discussion of the merits of the "informal foreclosure" used here would have any precedential value.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

NEW ENGLAND FISH COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. The BARGE OR VESSEL SONYA, etc., et al., Appellant.

Comments