Per Curiam.
In our opinion, respondent-employer was required to make simultaneous deductions on both a Family Court payroll deduction support order and an income execution ( Loan Serv. Corp. v. Bridgeport Lbr. Co., 27 Misc.2d 935, affd. without opn. 14 A.D.2d 827 [4th Dept.]; Costa v. Chevrolet-Tonawanda, Div. of Gen. Motors Corp., 53 Misc.2d 252, affd. without opn. 24 A.D.2d 732 [4th Dept.]).
The judgment should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and judgment for the sum of $192 awarded to petitioner.
Concur — HOGAN, P.J., GLICKMAN and PITTONI, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.