Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. HUGH KYLE NAUGHTEN, Appellant.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was tried and convicted upon jury trial of the crime of assault and robbery being armed with a dangerous weapon. The did not take the witness stand.

His sole ground of appeal is that the trial court erred in instructing the jury:

"Every witness is presumed to speak the truth. This presumption may be overcome by the manner in which the witness testifies, by the nature of his or her testimony, by evidence affecting his or her character, interest, or motives, by contradictory evidence, or by a presumption."

This instruction is not erroneous. State v. Kessler, 254 Or. 124, 458 P.2d 432 (1969); State v. Blank, 1 Or. App. 550, 464 P20 836 (1970).

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. NAUGHTEN
(Sep 22, 1970)