AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of the Claim of DARCY D. DINGMAN, Respondent, v. GENERAL FIBRE BOX COMPANY et al., Appellants. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.

Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from an alleged decision of the Workmen's Compensation Board, filed November 13, 1969. On April 24, 1969 the Workmen's Compensation Board filed its decision herein reversing a prior decision of the Referee and finding that claimant's disability began within four weeks of termination of employment and that claimant was entitled to disability benefits. (Workmen's Compensation Law, § 203.) On November 13, 1969 the Referee made a disability benefit award in accordance with the board's decision. On November 21, 1969 a notice of appeal from the Referee's award was filed. A direct appeal from a Referee's award of benefits is specifically proscribed by section 23 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law and, accordingly, it must be dismissed. ( Matter of Zambrona v. Renell Bake Shop, 34 A.D.2d 707; Matter of Shadorsky v. Longwood Parlor Furniture Corp., 33 A.D.2d 932.) Appeal from Referee's decision dismissed, without costs. Herlihy, P.J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF DINGMAN v. GENERAL FIBRE BOX COMPANY
(Sep 29, 1970)