Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

EHIK v. PIPER; and

PER CURIAM.

These appeals are from orders denying a motion for summary judgment filed by both the plaintiff and the defendant. The trial judge certified that the orders should be subject to review. Plaintiff sued for damages growing out of a collision between the automobile he was driving and an automobile driven by the son of the defendant.

There being a genuine issue on one or more material facts, the trial court did not err in overruling both motions for summary judgment.

Judgments affirmed. Hall, P. J., Deen and Evans, JJ., concur.

ARGUED MAY 6, 1970 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 25, 1970.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EHIK v. PIPER
(Sep 25, 1970)