MILMANCO CORP. v. COOKE

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 40906.

Attorney(S)

Jennings P. Felix, Felix Kraft, and Luzerne E. Hufford, Jr., for appellants. John H. Faltys and Uziel Faltys, for respondents.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

MILMANCO CORPORATION, Respondent, PHILIP B. LUNDSTROM et al., Appellants, v. THOMAS H. COOKE et al., Respondents. Reported in 475 P.2d 884.

[1] Appeal and Error — Findings of Fact — Review — In General. A reviewing court will affirm challenged findings of fact and resultant conclusions of law when an examination of the record shows substantial evidence to support them.

See 5 Am.Jur.2d, Appeal and Error § 839 et seq.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants Lundstrom appeal from a judgment in favor of respondents Cooke. The record indicates that a recitation of the facts which gave rise to the lawsuit will serve no useful purpose.

[1] The assignments of error upon which this appeal is predicated are directed solely to five findings of fact entered by the trial court. Since our examination of the record discloses substantial evidence to support each of the challenged findings of fact and resultant conclusions of law, we affirm. United Pac. Ins. Co. v. Lundstrom, 77 Wn.2d 162, 459 P.2d 930 (1969).

MILMANCO CORPORATION, Respondent, PHILIP B. LUNDSTROM et al., Appellants, v. THOMAS H. COOKE et al., Respondents. Reported in 475 P.2d 884.

Comments