Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JEANETTE PECKER, APPELLANT, v. SAMUEL PECKER, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a final judgment granting the appellee a divorce and denying her claim for alimony.

The sole question presented is whether the court erred in taking jurisdiction of the parties and subject matter. It is appellant's contention that the appellee did not prove that he had become a bona fide resident of the state of Florida for six months last past prior to filing his complaint for divorce.

It is a well established rule of law that the trial judge's findings of fact and conclusions of law come to the appellate court with a presumption of correctness and will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. No reversible error having been made to appear the judgment appealed must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PECKER v. PECKER
(Nov 3, 1970)