Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BEETS v. PADGETT.

QUILLIAN, Judge.

1. The plaintiff brought an action to recover a real estate commission which he alleged was due him by his employer who was a real estate broker. While there was evidence that the plaintiff was employed as a real estate salesman, the record fails to show that he had obtained a license as required by Code § 84-1410. It was a condition precedent to recovery that the plaintiff prove he had the necessary license and the failure to do so requires the grant of a new trial. Code Ann. § 84-1413. See Maxwell v. Tucker, 118 Ga. App. 695, 698 ( 165 S.E.2d 459); Household Finance Corp. v. Johnson, 119 Ga. App. 49 ( 165 S.E.2d 864); Dixon v. Rollins, 120 Ga. App. 557, 559 ( 171 S.E.2d 646).

2. The defendant also contends the evidence was not sufficient to support the verdict. With this contention we cannot agree. While in conflict, the testimony was enough to prove that the plaintiff was the procuring cause of the sale.

Judgment reversed. Bell, C. J., and Whitman, J., concur.

QUILLIAN, Judge.

SUBMITTED OCTOBER 1, 1970 — DECIDED DECEMBER 3, 1970.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BEETS v. PADGETT
(Dec 3, 1970)